In two previous posts (see below), I attempted to make cases for both Amillennialism and Historic Premillennialism using champions of each of the respective positions. The purpose was to aid in my own wrestling in these matters. Why leave out Dispensational Premillennialism and Postmillennialism? Why only present two of the four positions? From my study, I find Amillennialism and Historic Premillennialism to be the most plausible, and so I sought to develop each as persuasively as I could, with the purpose of seeing which one I found most plausible.
Here are the two previous posts: